The Capitol in Washington Wikipedia Presidential candidates have to take the Electoral College into consideration when mapping out campaign strategy. Received political wisdom has it that candidates cannot ignore the small states once the campaign begins in earnest after the primaries, because the electoral system guarantees them a prominent say in the results.
Candidates, therefore, have had to criss-cross the nation, appealing to sparsely populated rural areas, as well as voters in the large cities.
Over the past 20 years voting patterns in most states have stabilised, with fairly predictable results, reducing the weight of small states and even some larger ones. Special dossier Just a few large states, known as swing states, have hung in the balance. These "swing states", such as Florida or Ohio, thus become crucial battlegrounds.
In the past two elections, for example, candidates paid much more attention to campaigning in Florida than in New York, which was considered an obvious win for the Democrats, or in Texas, which was considered to be in the Republican camp.
Some political pundits are predicting, however, that the election this time may move these established goalposts. And this is forcing the candidates of both major parties to reinvent campaign strategy.
Critics say that the system is out of date, that in a modern democracy only the popular vote should count. Others say that the importance of the large swing states has become so great, that the original intention of the constitution to give a voice to the less populated states no longer holds.
Defenders of the Electoral College say that if it were to be eliminated, candidates would only campaign in the large urban centres, disregarding the rural vote entirely.
There is no consensus on whether the Electoral College should be abolished in favour of a direct vote. Every election year the topic of reform comes to the surface. But one of the obstacles to any change is the difficulty with which the constitution can be amended.
In keeping with the constitution's intention to divide power between the states and the central government, a constitutional amendment has to wend its way through both the federal and the state systems, getting the support of two-thirds of both houses of the US Congress plus three-quarters of the state legislatures or special conventions.Instead, these votes are “assigned by proportional representation”.
This means the candidate that wins the popular vote gets two Electoral College votes from the senators, and the rest of the votes are given according to which candidate wins each “congressional district”. However, every other state is on a winner-take-all system. May 24, · Best Answer: Well, firstly, the electoral college is kind of irrelevant to today's modern society.
BUT for the purpose of good debate, here ya go! -The electoral collee is necessary because of the populace's general disinterest in participating in heartoftexashop.com: Resolved.
The presidential election is already picking up speed as new candidates join the race and set out on their campaigns. Over the past decade, political discussions have migrated from water.
Notes Political Reality Uploaded by Gerrit Hendrik Schorel-Hlavka Political reality is a set out about your constitutional rights and how it is undermined not just by the action of others but yourself!
Nov 13, · The term "Electoral College" does not appear in the United States Constitution. The term emerged during the early s, and was written into federal law in During the Constitutional Convention a number of ideas regarding the vote for President were discussed.
On election day Lincoln captured slightly less than 40 percent of the vote, but he won a majority in the electoral college, with electoral votes, by sweeping the North (with the exception of New Jersey, which he split with Douglas) and also winning the Pacific Coast states of California and Oregon.
Douglas won nearly 30 percent of the vote.