Barbara schlifer paper

Author admin Comment 0 The Barbara Schlifer Commemorative Clinic of Toronto was created in memory of Barbara Teena Schlifer who was going to be a lawyer, but was brutally raped and murdered on April 1 lth On April 1 lthMayor of Toronto, amed Art Eggleton, announced that April 1 lth would be Barbara Schlifer Day, in memory of the difference she was going to make throughout her career. This clinic now helps more then 4, women each year and has grown to a staff of over 35 people.

Barbara schlifer paper

JuneE. The effect of this legislation was, inter alia, to keep intact the existing licensing requirements and various prohibitions on the use of firearms, but to repeal the long-gun registry system that had since required, on threat of criminal sanctions, the registration of non-restricted firearms.

It submits that by eliminating the requirement of registration for non-restricted firearms, the Act is contrary to section 7 fundamental justice and section 15 equality rights of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, part I of the Constitutional Act,being Schedule B to the Canada Act UK, c.

Legislative history and scheme [5] Untilthe offenses and restrictions pertaining to certain prohibited and restricted weaponry contained in the Criminal Code, RSCc.

It created a registry and the office of a Registrar to manage the registration system. The Firearms Act was accompanied with enforcement measures in sections of the Criminal Code, which created offenses and imposed prison sentences on persons who possess firearms but who fail to comply with the licensing and registration requirements.

In addition to a number of other incidental amendments, the Act also required the destruction of all registration records pertaining to non-restricted firearms that had previously been compiled by the Registrar under the Firearms Act.

The policy of the Act, as enunciated by the government members who tabled the legislation, was to increase the effectivity of existing licensing requirements for all firearms and registration requirements for prohibited and restricted guns by, inter alia, eliminating what was perceived to be the ineffective and burdensome registration requirement for non-restricted firearms.

In essence, Bill C retains licensing requirements for all gun owners, while doing away with the need for honest, law-abiding citizens to register their non-restricted rifles or shotguns, a requirement that is unfair and ineffective… The bill before us today is about making sure that we invest in initiatives that work.

It is about making sure we continue to protect the safety and security of Canadians without punishing people unnecessarily because of where they live or how they make a living. It requires all licensees to have first passed the Canadian Firearm Safety Course, and contains a number of eligibility requirements.

Just under 2, licenses were revoked pursuant to these provisions in In addition to the many existing Criminal Code provisions aimed at reducing armed crime and violence, in Parliament enacted the Tackling Violet Crime Act, SCc.

Barbara schlifer paper

It also made bail provisions more onerous for those accused of firearms offences, and reformed sentencing and monitoring of high risk offenders. Counsel for the Applicant puts the point most succinctly it in their factum: Long-guns and other non-restricted firearms are used by domestic partners both to threaten and in acts of direct violence against their victims, leading to physical and psychological trauma, and in many cases death.

As a result, regulation of these firearms engages s.

Ryerson’s office for sexual violence support and education is harming survivors | The Eyeopener Author admin Comment 0 This world goes through a lot of changes as time goes on.
Trending Now The OSVSE office was created at the beginning of summer after vice-provost students Heather Lane Vetere presented a report with recommendations to better address sexual violence on campus. OSVSE offers resources, support and assistance for sexual violence survivors.
The only problem, she said, was keeping it down to a reasonable size!

Citing Malmo-Levine, at parascounsel for the Crown submits in their factum that a claimant seeking to demonstrate a violation of section 7 of the Charter must prove: Section 7 speaks of the right not to be deprived of life, liberty and security of the person, except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.

Nothing in the jurisprudence thus far suggests that s. Action by the state or, conversely, inaction by the state will frequently have the effect of decreasing or increasing the risk to the lives or security of its citizens.

It may be argued, for example, that the failure of government to limit significantly the speed of traffic on the highways threatens our right to life and security in that it increases the risk of highway accidents. Such conduct would not, in my view, fall within the scope of the right protected by s.

Rodriguez, at [emphasis added]. While there is some merit to that observation, state action has never been dispensed with altogether as a requisite element in an infringement of section 7.

In recent years, the Court emphasized not the risk of harm that exists independent of the state, but the fact that the state actively blocked the claimant from taking steps to reduce the risk.

In PHS Community Services, the impugned legislation prevented the operation of a supervised drug facility and thereby blocked access to a risk reduction program; likewise, in Bedford, the challenged statutory provision made a lawful activity more risky by denying access to security-enhancing safeguards.

The Court in both instances was clear that it was an interventionist step by government that caused the harm since it was government that blocked access to a remedy and that effectively imposed the risk anew.

While the argument in the present case is rhetorically similar to those in PHS and Bedford, it actually follows a different logic. Unlike in PHS and Bedford, where government blocked access to risk-reduction mechanisms, here the government created the risk-reduction mechanism and is now modifying it.

Since there is no constitutional entitlement to their existence, their elimination or reduction is not an infringement of Charter rights.

By contrast, the Firearms Act, as amended by the Act, is a statutory licensing, reporting, and registration scheme that has been defined and limited in ways that Parliament, in its wisdom, has deemed most effective. Rights and entitlements may expand over time from a stable constitutional foundation.

Press,at pp. Legislatures require substantial freedom in designing the substantive content, procedural mechanisms, and enforcement remedies in legislation of this kind. Had Parliament in created a firearms registry for handguns but not for long-guns, it would have been a legitimate policy choice in support of potential victims of gun violence.But you see, you would only know this if you worked with her at the Barbara Schlifer Clinic for many years.

Lynn Jenkins and Amanda Dale hid her abuse. a larger paper will want to report on. Barbara Schlifer Paper Posted on May 23, March 28, Author admin The Barbara Schlifer Commemorative Clinic of Toronto was created in memory of Barbara Teena Schlifer who was going to be a lawyer, but was brutally raped and murdered on April 1 lth BARBARA SCHLIFER COMMEMORATIVE CLINIC - ANNUAL REPORT We're growing for all the right reasons You are part of a small but mighty clinic that makes a big diff erence in individual women’s lives and in the world.

Over the last year we have taken on bold new strategic directions through a detailed planning process. The Barbara Schlifer Commemorative Clinic The Barbara Schlifer Commemorative Clinic of Toronto was created in memory of Barbara Teena Schlifer who was going to be a lawyer, but was brutally raped and murdered on April 11th The Schlifer Clinic is not able to provide funding for summer students.

Barbara schlifer paper

However, some law schools provide fellowships or course credit for unpaid interns. The Clinic is able to assist by providing letters of support as required. It is the responsibility of applicants to organize their own funding/course credit.

y The Barbara Schlifer Clinic y The South Asian Legal Clinic of Ontario (SALCO) y The Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (METRAC) y Community Legal Education Ontario (CLEO) y The Young Women’s Christian Association (YWCA) y The Social Services Network.

Roman Republic and Caesar Doth Bear Essay - patent debate